7
Mehdi akbari; Fariborz Abbasi; Abolfazl Nasseri; Afshin Gomrokchi; mostafa goodarzi; Amir Eslami; masoud Farzamnia; r alimohammadi; Nader Kouhi Chellehkaran; Reza Bahramloo; Ali Ghadami Firouzabadi; seyed abolghassem Haghayeghi moghaddam; Ardalan Zolfagharan; Jamal Ahmadaali; Mohamad Abasi; Hamid Riahi; Mohammad Mehdi Nakhjavanimoghaddam
Abstract
In this study, volume of irrigation water, water productivity, and yield of alfalfa were measured in 300 farms in Zanjan, Fars, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Hamedan, East Azerbaijan, Semnan, Khorasan-Razavi, Isfahan, West Azerbaijan, Central, Qazvin and Kerman provinces under farmers management and surface ...
Read More
In this study, volume of irrigation water, water productivity, and yield of alfalfa were measured in 300 farms in Zanjan, Fars, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Hamedan, East Azerbaijan, Semnan, Khorasan-Razavi, Isfahan, West Azerbaijan, Central, Qazvin and Kerman provinces under farmers management and surface and sprinkler irrigation, various water sources, different water salinities, soil conditions, and varieties, during the growing season of 2018-2019. The results showed that the difference between average volumes of water applied by farmers, yield, and water productivity, in the studied sites were significant at 1% probability level. The average amount of applied water by farmers was 8502, 8901, 9226, 9459, 11481, 12796, 14311, 14821, 15198, 15916, 18351 and 23920 m3/ha, respectively, and the average was 13284 m3/ha. The dry yield of alfalfa varied from 2500 to 30000 kg/ha with an average of 13841 kg/ha. Irrigation water productivity varied from 0.2 to 4.5 and its average was 1.28 kg/m3. The average irrigation water plus effective rainfall productivity for alfalfa was 1.19 kg/m3. The results showed that the average applied water and alfalfa yield in surface and sprinkler irrigation methods were 15076 and 10653 m3/ha, respectively, (p<1%). These results showed that in sprinkler irrigation method, applied water was 30% less and irrigation water plus effective rainfall productivity was 41% higher. Accordingly, in order to reduce the volume of irrigation water and improve alfalfa water productivity, it is recommended to use sprinkler method in suitable climatic conditions where irrigation water is of good quality and the technical criteria of design, implementation, operation, and economic considerations are met.
Mehdi RezaeeKormenani; Mehdi akbari; mehdi Kouchakzadeh
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of wick irrigation system in greenhouse cultivation of tomato plant and compare it with drip irrigation. The experiment was performed as factorial with a completely randomized design (CRD) in the research greenhouse of Tarbiat Modares University in 2021. Irrigation ...
Read More
This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of wick irrigation system in greenhouse cultivation of tomato plant and compare it with drip irrigation. The experiment was performed as factorial with a completely randomized design (CRD) in the research greenhouse of Tarbiat Modares University in 2021. Irrigation treatments included five levels (drip irrigation and wick irrigation with diameters of 1, 3, 4, and 5 cm) and two soil combination ("cocopeat, soil, fertilizer, perlite" and "soil, sand, fertilizer"), in 3 replications. The lowest and highest water consumption during the growing season was observed in wick irrigation with a diameter of 1 cm (29.25 L/plant) and in drip irrigation and wicks with a diameter of 5 cm (36 and 37.5 L/plant), respectively. The results showed differences of 19% and 4% in water consumption between, respectively, wick irrigation with a diameter of 1 and 5 cm compared to drip irrigation. Also, the difference in water consumption between wick irrigation (minimum and maximum water consumption) of 1 and 5 cm diameters was 28%. The yield in "soil, sand, fertilizer" cultivation bed was increased by 59% compared to the "cocopeat, soil, fertilizer, perlite" cultivation bed and the maximum tomato yield (700gr/plant) was observed in the wick irrigation with a diameter of 3 cm. Water consumption index in "soil, sand, fertilizer" cultivation bed was decreased 21%, rather than "cocopeat, soil, fertilizer, perlite" cultivation bed and increased water productivity by 100%. In wick irrigation, since water is always available, the plant does not face water stress and these results indicate that the wick irrigation system improves plant growth and increases production of wet and dry matter and water productivity in tomato plant. Although economic analysis has not been done in this research, but more crop yield along with less water consumption in the wick irrigation system would have more income for the user and can be an acceptable reason for using this irrigation method.
7
Mehdi Akbari; Fariborz Abbasi; Abolazal Nasseri; Mohammad Ali Shahrokhnia; Mohammad Khorramian; Masoud Farzamnia; majid keramati targhi; Azarakhs Azizi; Mohamad Abasi; Eshag Zare; Hasan Khosravi; Esmaeil Moghbeli; Mohammad Mehdi Nakhjavanimoghaddam; Nader Abbasi; Javad Baghani
Abstract
This project was implemented with the aim of measuring water applied to onion under farmers’ management in 190 selected sites at the production hubs of onion in Iran including Azarbaijan Sharghi, Isfahan, Khusestan, Zanjan, Kerman, Fars, Khorasan Razavi, Khorasan Shomali, and Hormozgan provinces. ...
Read More
This project was implemented with the aim of measuring water applied to onion under farmers’ management in 190 selected sites at the production hubs of onion in Iran including Azarbaijan Sharghi, Isfahan, Khusestan, Zanjan, Kerman, Fars, Khorasan Razavi, Khorasan Shomali, and Hormozgan provinces. According to the results, differences between the average volumes of irrigation water in those provinces, different irrigation methods, various sources and salinities of irrigation water and soil, and different onion varieties were significant (p<1%), during the growing season of 2020-2021. The average amount of applied water by farmers in those provinces was 9502, 13273, 9740, 16588, 9618, 13880, 11998, 8438 and 7057 m3/ha, respectively, with the weighted average of 10823 m3/ha. The onion yield in selected sites, varied from 20000 to 90000 kg/ha, with an average of 49980 kg/ha. The measured values were compared with the net irrigation water requirement estimated by the FAO Penman-Monteith method and with the National Water Document values. The results showed that the differences between average volumes of applied water by farmers, yield and irrigation water productivity, and irrigation water plus effective rainfall productivity in the selected sites were significant at 5% probability level. Irrigation water productivity varied from 3.13 to 6.30 kg/m3 and its average was 4.93 kg/m3. The average irrigation water plus effective rainfall productivity for onion in Iran was 4.50 kg/m3. The average net irrigation water requirement in the study areas by the Penman-Monteith method and the National Water Document were 8834 and 6972 m3/ha, respectively. These results showed that the average applied water in surface, sprinkler, and drip irrigation methods were 11453, 12740 and 10317 m3/ha, respectively, with significant (p<5%) difference. These results showed that in drip irrigation method, applied water was 10% lesser while irrigation water plus effective rainfall productivity was 35% higher. Transplanting seedling compared to direct seeding caused 14.7% reduction in applied water and 16.7% increase in water productivity. According to the results of this study, drip irrigation and transplanting method for onion fields is recommended.
2
mohammad amin khandan barani; Peyman Afrasiab; mehdi akbari; Masoomeh Delbari
Abstract
In this research, the status of water productivity for wheat production and strategies to increase water productivity in different quantitative conditions of water was determined and analyzed in the irrigation district of Sistan Dam. In this regard, the SWAP simulation model was calibrated and validated ...
Read More
In this research, the status of water productivity for wheat production and strategies to increase water productivity in different quantitative conditions of water was determined and analyzed in the irrigation district of Sistan Dam. In this regard, the SWAP simulation model was calibrated and validated by considering the current water resources operation, various quantities of irrigation water, and use of field information. Water production functions were used to determine the irrigation schedule (time and depth) for wheat crop. The results of field measurements in the crop year 2016-2017 in the irrigation district showed that farmers irrigate wheat on average four times in the current conditions. Farmers' average crop yield and water productivity were about 1450 kg/ha and 0.41 kg/m3, respectively. These results show that available water is not appropriately used and should be addressed with practical solutions to improve water productivity. The validation and calibration results of the SWAP model also showed the high accuracy of the model in the case study. The results of different management scenarios of eliminating some irrigation shifts compared to the existing conditions indicated that, although there was no significant difference in water productivity, crop yield decreases about 37%. The results of evaluating the scenarios of reducing the depth and frequency of irrigation (using 640 mm per season and applying 40 mm at each shift) showed that, with reliable and timely water supply and more frequent irrigation, water productivity could be increased by 30% compared to the baseline scenario; and crop yield can be doubled. In these scenarios, the presence of adequate moisture in the plant's root zone increases the yield, and the amount of deep percolation is greatly reduced. The amount of water used by farmers is excessive for various reasons. Therefore, it is recommended to train farmers on how to improve irrigation and crop management according to the water available in the irrigation district, so that they can distribute water according to the real needs of the plant and irrigate at the right time and sufficient quantity.
ali ataee; Mehdi Akbari; Mohammadreza Neyshabouri; zahra ghaffari; Davood Zarehaghi
Abstract
To investigate the effects of substituting surface drip irrigation (DI) by subsurface drip-irrigation systems (SDI) on plant responses, a10 ha pistachio orchard with DI system located in Shahriar, Tehran province, was selected. Irrigation treatments including DI and SDI with saline water and DI with ...
Read More
To investigate the effects of substituting surface drip irrigation (DI) by subsurface drip-irrigation systems (SDI) on plant responses, a10 ha pistachio orchard with DI system located in Shahriar, Tehran province, was selected. Irrigation treatments including DI and SDI with saline water and DI with non-saline water (A) were established and plant responses were measured. The salinity distribution results showed that, in DI, at depth of 30-50 cm and distance of 70-100 cm, salts were accumulated. In SDI, salt accumulation was observed in surface layer and in distance of 60-80 cm from the tree. Based on all plant response indicators, treatment A showed significantly more favorable conditions. Unlike treatment A, there was no significant difference in the “canopy temperature” and “canopy–air temperature difference” between DI and SDI. By normalization of environmental-effects on foliage temperature, crop water stress index (CWSI) showed significant differences between DI and SDI treatments. Also, stomata conductance in SDI was significantly greater than DI. Additionally, treatment A had significantly the highest sap flow (SF). Based on SF measurement in 24 hour, there were no significant differences between DI and SDI irrigation systems, but the mean of this index for daylight time and midday, showed significant differences. With equal depth of irrigation water applied to DI and SDI and more favorable salinity distribution in root zone of SDI, this treatment leads to less water and salinity stress. Although the use of subsurface drip irrigation system requires long-term studies, but in view of the observed plant responses and in terms of soil salinity distribution, it is recommended to use SDI in pistachio trees.
ali ataee; Mohammadreza Neyshaboori; Mehdi Akbari; Davood Zare haghi; Ajdar Onnabi Milani
Abstract
Multidimensional nature of water flow, plant uptake, and high frequency of water application increase the complexity in modeling soil moisture dynamics from trickle irrigation. By determining soil hydraulic properties, parameters of root distribution model for pistachio trees in the field, evapotranspiration ...
Read More
Multidimensional nature of water flow, plant uptake, and high frequency of water application increase the complexity in modeling soil moisture dynamics from trickle irrigation. By determining soil hydraulic properties, parameters of root distribution model for pistachio trees in the field, evapotranspiration and inflow flux, soil moisture distribution was modeled using HYDRUS-2D model for surface (DI) and sub-surface drip irrigation (SDI) systems. Also, soil moisture content in the following days after irrigation was measured at different lateral and vertical distances from the tree by using Moisture Meter Profile Probe. Leaf stomatal conductance was used to test the model and parameterize water-stress response function. The h50 for pistachio tree, which represents the pressure head at which the water extraction rate is reduced by 50%, was calculated 4935 cm. HYDRUS outputs were compared with measured data in corresponding locations, and values ofME, RMSE, E and R2 statistics were obtained -0.002, 0.02, 0.7, 0.741 for DI and 0.006, 0.021, 0.761, and 0.794 for SDI respectively. The calculated transpiration by HYDRUS showed high correlation with stomatal conductance, especially in SDI. Based on plant measurements and HYDRUS results, root water uptake in SDI was significantly more than DI. Therefore, using SDI systems, by decreasing evaporation, saves more water and increases irrigation efficiency. The calculated root water uptake and measured stomatal conductance for the pistachio trees revealed that soil moisture perfectly supports plants until four days after irrigation. Thus, by decreasing irrigation interval in the field, maximum potential of drip irrigation systems can be achieved.